Episode 13 - Tubal factor infertility: treatment, surgery and fertility options - Dr Vanessa Tatham
Tubal factor infertility: looking beyond ovulation
Regular cycles and a reassuring semen analysis do not answer every question about why a pregnancy has not occurred. The fallopian tubes play an active role in reproduction, and problems with their structure or function can be overlooked if assessment focuses only on ovulation and sperm.
In this episode of Fertility in General Practice, host Dr Ali Hodgkinson speaks with Dr Vanessa Tatham about tubal factor infertility. They discuss possible causes, how a careful history can raise suspicion and the investigations and treatment options that may be considered when the tubes are part of the fertility picture.
More than a passage between ovary and uterus
Dr Tatham describes the fallopian tube as an active environment, not simply a pipe. Its lining, tiny hair-like structures and muscular movement help transport the egg and support the early stages of reproduction.
A blockage can prevent egg and sperm from meeting, but a tube can also be affected in ways that are not captured by the question of whether it is open. Inflammation, damage to the lining and changes around the tube can all be relevant. This helps explain why assessment needs to consider both anatomy and the patient's history.
What can raise suspicion?
The episode explores pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, previous abdominal or pelvic surgery and a history of ectopic pregnancy. These may affect the tubes through infection, inflammation, scarring or adhesions. Not every patient with one of these factors will have tubal infertility, but the history can guide what needs further investigation.
Dr Tatham encourages GPs to take a detailed account of previous infections, operations and pregnancy outcomes. A patient may not connect an earlier event with current fertility concerns, so asking directly can uncover information that would otherwise be missed.
Understanding tubal patency tests
A general pelvic ultrasound may identify some abnormalities, including a fluid-filled tube, but it does not provide the same information as a dedicated test of tubal patency. The episode discusses hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography, commonly called HyCoSy, and hysterosalpingography, or HSG.
These investigations use fluid or contrast to assess passage through the tubes. They can also provide information about the uterine cavity. Dr Tatham explains that the choice of investigation depends on the clinical question, local expertise and access, as well as the patient's circumstances.
Laparoscopy and fertiloscopy are also discussed as ways of assessing the pelvis in selected situations. Patients should understand why a particular investigation is being proposed, what it may feel like and what the findings could change about their care.
Treatment depends on the kind of damage
The conversation draws an important distinction between improving the shape or openness of a tube and restoring its full function. An operation may be able to address an external obstruction or adhesion, but severe damage to the internal lining may create a different problem.
That is why surgery is not a universal answer. The likely benefit needs to be weighed against the risks, other fertility factors and the patient's goals. Preserving a tube, removing it or considering assisted reproduction can each be appropriate in different circumstances. A specialist assessment helps patients understand the reasoning behind the options.
Why hydrosalpinx matters in IVF planning
Dr Tatham discusses hydrosalpinx, where a blocked tube contains fluid. Patients may assume that the tubes no longer matter if they are having IVF. However, an affected tube can still be relevant to the environment within the uterus and to treatment planning.
The episode considers situations where removal or isolation of a tube may be discussed before assisted reproduction. These are individual decisions, particularly when adhesions make surgery difficult or there are concerns about nearby ovarian tissue. The aim is to plan treatment around both the tubal problem and the wider reproductive picture.
Avoiding unnecessary delay
A central message for GPs is to follow a clinically relevant suspicion. If cycles and sperm testing do not explain ongoing difficulty conceiving, the tubes should remain part of the assessment rather than being forgotten while the patient continues trying without a clear plan.
A useful referral brings together infection and surgical history, previous ectopic pregnancies, available imaging and other fertility investigations. Explaining why tubal testing is being considered can help patients understand the next step and feel more involved in decisions about their care.
Listen to the episode
Listen to Dr Vanessa Tatham and Dr Ali Hodgkinson discuss tubal assessment, surgery and assisted fertility options. The conversation gives GPs a practical reminder to consider the tubes early when the history or pattern of fertility difficulties suggests they may be involved.
About Dr Vanessa Tatham
Dr Vanessa Tatham is a specialist gynaecologist and fertility doctor based in the Illawarra. Her services include fertility assessment, gynaecological care, minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery and advanced hysteroscopic procedures. She completed further fertility training at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital after her specialist fellowship. Her approach places importance on individualised care, clear information and patient choice.
.png "Genea logo"){kind=logo}
.png)
